Online security failures often result in identity theft. We don't seem to be getting very high quality information to make decisions with. There are, nevertheless, a variety of encryption and cryptology services that can increase a person's privacy. No one knows how the root zones and other key services will be managed once the U. . I've been writing about technology for most of my adult life, focusing mainly on legal and regulatory issues.
There will come a time when this actually happens and these institutions will lose more data as they have in the past. Steve - Ohio The government should only have power with regard to their own networks. There shall be interesting times indeed. If we have an attack its to late to shut down the internet backbone. This internet stuff is just a ploy to draw attention away from regulating these big companies that are taking advantage of the American People. We citizens could take it back but we have been propagandized in a coma of hate and anger. Ask the same individual about federal monitoring of their electronic information and the answer is horror mixed with anger.
They are afraid that the public is awakening and want to stop it. Maybe Lieberman should be working on term limitations for congress instead! It is necessary to keep a health environment and the social security. However, I believe, a permissive approach can lead to a situation… 1094 Words 5 Pages Government Intervention in the Internet A growing concern over our privacy online is causing us to seek legislation to protect us. So what are they really up to? It is one slippery slope. I can't believe this is even a question to be asked.
The government would have more people staffed to monitor the internet than there are users on the internet. How much more control does this government want?? If certain groups from around the world were to ever band together companies like B. I guess if 10 people say it's ok to post this or that then it is socially acceptable. Mario Ritter was the editor. It suggests that the industry could develop better if the government does not intervene it. While there are certainly some disturbing things on the Internet, censorship is not the answer.
But then given that it's Joe Lieberman who is sponsoring the bill, I guess it probably is. How is information the world needs to hear going to spread at the rate it does now if the internet is taken down. They note the ironies of Kazaa's position: partly in defiance of U. The intention is to maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the internet — along with its openness. Because of the technology, criminals can very easy to hire themselves behind the internet which makes this problem more difficult to solve with. They know that the only real stories about their criminal activities are available on the internet.
An enemy could rake havoc and bring us to our knees without even firing a shot. Although the company has been handling the guts of the Internet for decades, VeriSign is an American company subject to U. Chuck Grassley, a Republican who represents Iowa. A great many communications by us Americans are still made the old-fashioned way with such phone calls. How much power should they have in deciding what you can or cannot access? Governments are getting smarter about control in such circumstances, and perhaps more ruthless. From my cold, dead, hands.
If there is concern of cyber terrorism, then fix that without shutting everything down completely. The sheriff arrives Governments have been pushing back, however. This, however is not a perfect government, not a perfect world. Background Back to late 1980s in China, some young people in college or research institute had a chance to surf the Internet through a fairly low speed, roughly routed World Wide Web connection. As the Senate debates the , passed by the House of Representatives on May 13, it is well to consider how little our government actually controls the Internet, and how incapable we are to assert our will over the Internet.
The military let Bill Gates run with the concept of personal computers. Why do you think repressive governments the world over try to suppress their citizens rights to access open discussions. Georgia for Change It's time for the President to effect the Change that was promised. This is just another attempt of the government to control what the people see and hear. Federal intelligence agencies claim this information is helpful in countering terrorism. I can see it now.
The same power that government has the power to insure free speech and freedom of the press. While these matters raise fundamental questions of the role of governments as defenders and prosecutors of the national interest, they do not relate directly to the abilities of government to control the day-to-day activities of the Internet. I say we clean house and start over. Department of Commerce, through the U. The individual should take the responsibility for themselves as to what they find when surfing the Internet.