Now I am going to shed some light on these points below. You should write at least 250 words. But their helping should only stop at providing such things as food and education because of following reasons. However, we should and we have to stimulate the development of poorer countries. One more important thing to know: the four criteria are equally weighted. No nation has any obligation to give their wealth to others just because they are suffering. In recent years, there is a controversial issue is that the rich countries should share their assets among the poorer countries or not.
Several main reasons will be analyzed in this essay. His ideas about money, government, and people in general, have guided the thoughts and actions of many of the economists that have followed him. To provide something does not solve problems that poorer countries have. In recent years, there is a controversial issue is that the rich countries should share their assets among the poorer countries or not. For More Details: Give your writing a good structure 1 Introduction is a must.
In addition, technique of construction can be provided to construct schools and many facilities they need. Many industrial countries have opened their branches cooperation in my countries. Idea Generation for this essay: Essay Question: Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? While masters increased their wealth, slaves' life standard decreased tremendously. Many industrial countries have opened their branches cooperation in my countries. Or is this the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens? We have to live in peace and love. Who wants to prepare and spend time cooking when you could just wait a few minutes to have someone make you food? In short, a combination of technology and trained efficient young professionals can build up the long term economic status of the country. The first way to get wealth for any country is to have a quality education system.
When the living standard has been improved, they can afford to quality good and the trade all over the world will be more prosperous. Wealthy nations should be required to share their wealth among poorer nations because everybody breathes in a single worldwide classification and also the world economic is still imbalance. First of all, it all started with the invention of steam power. As an example, Japanese did not have any wealth in the past, but they focused only on their education system by perfecting it from time to time. Coupled with a fall in aid, poor nations may experience recession and since poor nations are used to getting aid from rich nations, they may be unable to. Why governments of poor nations should look after themselves? First of all, people from wealth nations and poorer ones are all human beings so it is difficult to look at, hear of or talk about people who lack education or even basic human needs like food or clothes without any sympathy and compassion.
That is why, I think that wealthy states do not have to share their wealth among the poor. Moreover, this help might create trade relationships among nations. It is hoped that we forget those artificial international borders and tackle this problem as a humanity to create an egalitarian world where no child is starved and no student is deprived of education. It will give them a chance to be the best by learning from others, not by begging from them. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Thus, in my view, I strongly believe that the wealthy countries should take some responsibility to share parts of their wealth to those poorer nations. Write down the key ideas as short as possible. This means that the poor is not only more prone to negative impacts of economic crises but also in more difficult circumstances. This is a big obstacle to world trade activities. In conclusion, if the richer can give their wealth and the poorer can improve by themselves, we will soon have a thriving future. I believe that sharing is one of the possible solutions to reduce such problem. Thus, given the international spotlight that these countries were under, it is critical for us to know if democracy is an ideology that should be embraced by poorer countries.
So as seen from above example, rich nations ought to help others in providing better access to food, education, healthcare etc. Week 5 Eco 301 Should Wealthy Nations be helping Poorer Nations? As the first may lead to making them even poorer and also increases the number of criminal actions and even worse in some cases potentially making some people joining terroristic groups. Several main reasons will be analyzed in this essay. No, the structure you have just seen is a structure for an opinion essay. In conclusion both wealthy and poor nations should do their best for their people. In addition, the economy of poor countries gets worse because they have lost their most skilful and educated people while they need them to work and lead these nation to a better future. All these conflicts are extremely dangerous and we should avoid them if we want to save this world.
So, sharing wealth is an useful way to prevent people from that bad. To begin with, the government should fulfil the necessities of the people because of whom they got the power. In addition, helping the poor nations means upgrading their social status and this will prevent or play a major role in reducing both internal and international crime such as terrorism and this would foster peace and stability and hence development for both rich and poor nations. You need to go through each of them and study the structure for the particular writing type. In the article I read in the New York Times it does tell about how aid has bettered not just the countries that are being helped but as the world as a whole benefitting from the aid. Beginning with lack of natural resources, poor nations cannot take advantages of fertile soil to cultivate or minerals to exploit. These arguments will be analysed prior to coming to a reasoned conclusion.